I’ve said it before and I’ll most likely say it again.  When my heart needs a kick-start, when my hope needs a pick me up, I like to read Chesterton.

Here’s some reasons why:

If our life is ever really as beautiful as a fairy tale, we shall have to remember that all the beauty of a fairy tale lies in this: that the prince has a wonder which just stop short of being fear.  If he is afraid of the giant, there is an end of him; but also if he is not astonished at the giant, there is an end of the fairy tale.  The whole point depends upon his being at once humble enough to wonder, and haughty enough to defy.  So our attitude to the giant of the world must not merely be increasing delicacy or increasing contempt: it must be one particular proportion of the two — which is exactly right.  We must have in us enough reverence for all things outside us to make us tread fearfully on the grass.  We must also have enough disdain for all things outside us, to make us, on due occasion, spit at the stars.  Yet these two things (if we are to be good or happy) must be combined, not in any combination, but in one particular combination.  The perfect happiness of men on the earth (if it ever coms) will not be a flat and solid thing, like the satisfaction of animals.  it will be an exact and perilous balance; like that of a desperate romance.  Man must have enough faith in himself to ha,ve adventures, and just enough doubt of himself to enjoy them.

On Revolution:
A strict rule is not only necessary for ruling; it is also necessary for rebelling.  This fixed and familiar ideal is necessary to any sort of revolution.  Man will sometimes act slowly upon new ideas; but he will only act swiftly upon old ideas.  If I am merely to float or fade or evolve, it may be towards something anarchic; but if I am to riot, it must be for something respectable.  This is the whole weakness of certain schools of progress and moral evolution.  They suggest that there has been a slow movement towards morality, with an imperceptible ethical change in every year or at every instant.  There is only one great disadvantage in this theory.  It talks of a slow movement towards justice; but it does not permit a swift movement.  A man is not allowed to leap up and declare a certain state of things to be intrinsically intolerable…. When I had written this down, I felt once again the presence of something else in the discussion: as a man hears a church bell above the sound of the street.  Something seemed to be saying “My ideal at least is fixed; for it was fixed before the foundations of the world.  My vision of perfection assuredly cannot be altered; for it is called Eden.  You may alter the place to which you are going; but you cannot alter the place from which you have come.  To the orthodox there must always be a case for revolution; for in the hearts of men God has been put under the feet of Satan.  In the upper world hell once rebelled against heaven.  But in this world heaven is rebelling against hell.  For the orthodox there can always be a revolution; for a revolution is a restoration.  At any instant you may strike a blow for the perfection which no man has seen since Adam…. “

On progress:

We may say broadly that free thought is the best of all the safeguards against freedom.  Managed in a modern style the emancipation of the slave’s mind is the best way of preventing the emancipation of teh slave.  Teach him to worry about whether he wants to be free, and he will not free himself…. He is calmed and kept in his place by a constant succession of wild philosophies…. The only thing that remains after all the philosophies is the factory…. As long as the vision of heaven is always changing, the vision of earth will be exactly the same.  No ideal will remain long enough to be realized, or even partly realized.  The modern young man will never change his environment; for he will always change his mind.

-from Orthodoxy

Share